Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: What’s the best 5G phone under $500?
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: What'due south the best 5G phone under $500?
When you have the new Samsung Galaxy A52 5G go upwardly against the Google Pixel 4a 5G in a caput-to-head battle, the last upshot turns out to be razor sparse — just what y'all'd await from two Android phones that accept a lot in mutual.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has been amongst the all-time 5G phones since it launched tardily last year, offer a high-speed connectivity in a well-engineered parcel for less than $500. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G looks to challenge that past offering far more hardware for the aforementioned — or even less — coin.
- Cheque out more of our best cheap phones picks
- See the best Android phones for more choices across a wider price range
Although Samsung's phone is arguably more generous with features, the Pixel still offers a more refined experience in some areas. In this Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G confront-off, we've broken downward how the phones compare in their key areas, and tried to effigy out which one is the overall all-time option for a budget phone buyer.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Specs
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
| Starting cost | $499/£399 | $499/£499 |
| Display | 6.five-inch FHD AMOLED (1080 ten 2400) | 6.two-inch FHD OLED (1080 ten 2340) |
| Refresh rate | 60Hz/120Hz | 60Hz |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 750G | Snapdragon 765G |
| RAM | 6GB | 6GB |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB |
| microSD | Yep, up to 1TB | No |
| Rear cameras | 64MP chief (f/i.8), 12MP ultrawide (f/2.two), 5MP macro (f/ii.two), 5MP depth sensor (f/ii.2) | 12MP main (ƒ/1.7 ); 16MP ultra-wide (ƒ/2.2) |
| Front camera | 32MP (f/2.2) | 8MP (ƒ/2.0) |
| Operating arrangement | Android eleven with One UI 3.0 | Android 10/eleven |
| Battery size | 4,500 mAh | 3,885 mAh |
| Charging speed | 25W wired | 18W wired |
| Water/dust resistance | IP67 | None; IP52 for Verizon version |
| Size | 6.3 x 2.ix 10 0.three inches (159.9 x 75.one x 8.4mm) | half-dozen.1 x 2.9 x 0.3 inches (153.ix x 74 x viii.ii mm) |
| Weight | vi.seven ounces (189 grams) | five.9 ounces (168 grams) |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Toll
Both the Galaxy A52 5G and Pixel 4a 5G sit at the upper stop of the midrange market — not as expensive equally flagship devices from Samsung and Google, simply not as inexpensive as upkeep models.
British shoppers get a much better deal on the Galaxy A52 5G with costs $499/£399, with for its lone model with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. Those retentiveness and storage specs are the same for the lone Google Pixel 4a 5G model, which costs $499/£499. (Verizon sells its own variant of the Pixel 4a 5G to work with its loftier-speed 5G network — that costs $599.) If you're a U.Thousand. customer, so, the Milky way A52 5G becomes the obvious choice for existence £100 cheaper than the Pixel. In the U.S., however, both phones toll exactly the same.
Winner: Samsung Milky way A52 5G
Samsung Milky way A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Pattern
Samsung and Google both opted for monochrome plastic shells for these phones. The Pixel 4a 5G but comes in black however, while the Galaxy A52 offers black plus brighter options like blue, purple and white.
On the front, both phones utilise punch-hole cutouts in their displays to house a unmarried selfie cam. On the dorsum, both phones as well utilize square camera bumps, although the Samsung'south cameras ascent more gradually from the back than the Pixel's practise, giving information technology a unique single-piece look.
The back of the Pixel also features a fingerprint scanner. Samsung'due south phone uses an in-brandish fingerprint scanner instead.
Another practical point in the Samsung's favor is water/dust resistance. The Milky way A52 5G is IP67 rated, pregnant it is totally dustproof and can survive for xxx minutes under upwardly to 1 meter (3 anxiety and 3 inches) of water. While the Pixel 4a 5G does have some waterproofing, it doesn't offer an official IP rating. The Pixel 4a 5G UW variant sold past Verizon is rated IP52, meaning it'southward effectively resistant to penetration by dust and dripping water. All the same fifty-fifty that doesn't match up to the Samsung's rating.
Winner: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Display
The Pixel 4a's screen is a 6.2-inch AMOLED panel with an FHD resolution and a 60Hz refresh rate. The Galaxy A52 also features FHD resolution just blows the other specs away with a larger 6.5-inch display and a faster 120Hz refresh charge per unit.
Afterwards watching the new trailer for the Mortal Kombat movie, the A52 does perform meliorate, but merely subtly. Both phones display the flames, ice and ecology debris from the fight scenes with equally good detail and colour. The but affair the Galaxy A52 had in its favor was its increased size, but if the video had supported a higher refresh rate, the A52 would have been an like shooting fish in a barrel winner.
The A52 5G's screen did pick up some scratches in our fourth dimension reviewing that phone, with the harm with frightening ease. Assuming that was a ane-off problem, the Galaxy A52 5G is overall the better phone if you care about watching movies or playing games at their best.
Winner: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Cameras
The Galaxy A52 packs double the number of rear cameras that the Pixel 4a 5G does. While the Pixel has 12MP main and 16MP ultrawide lenses, the A52 counters with a 64MP main camera, a 12MP ultrawide camera, a 5MP macro camera and a 5MP depth sensor.
Both phones use a unmarried front camera. In the Pixel's case it'due south an 8MP sensor, while the A52 uses a larger 32MP sensor.
Comparing shots captured by both phones reveals interesting differences in how the A52 and Pixel 4a 5G handle photography. For example, looking at the main sensors' take on this pond scene shows how much brighter the images are from the Samsung's larger sensor.
However that doesn't work so well when in low-low-cal. The Pixel 4a uses Google's splendid Nighttime Sight photography mode, which gives it a more than saturated image than the unappealing one the Samsung took of this pub.
The Pixel 4a 5G is much more constructive when you apply its ultrawide bending lens. This image looking down from the peak of Parliament Hill is brighter than the equivalent from the Samsung.
Turning to the forepart cameras on each phone, y'all might expect the larger camera on the Samsung to perform improve than the Pixel'south smaller sensor. Any reward the actress megapixels offer is removed with portrait fashion turned on even so. With Google's software offering meliorate saturation and a smoother texture to hide pores and stray hairs, the Pixel 4a 5G wins out over again.
As notation higher up, the Milky way A52 packs some extra sensors y'all won't detect on the Pixel 4a 5G, such as a macro camera. Sadly like many smartphone macro cameras, the A52's version doesn't accept especially practiced photos compared to its other sensors.
The depth sensor helps the A52 produce a ameliorate-looking blur than the Pixel 4a 5G in this rear portrait mode shot. Although the Pixel'southward post-processing software is excellent, it can't compete with a dedicated sensor on the Samsung.
While the Galaxy A52 5G doesn't always height the Pixel 4a 5G in direct comparisons, the actress rear sensors give the A52 5G additional versatility that helps make the Pixel's victory a narrow 1.
Winner: Google Pixel 4a 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Functioning
Samsung and Google have used similar silicon in their phones. The Milky way A52 5G is equipped with the Snapdragon 750G, while the Pixel 4a 5G turns to the Snapdragon 765G. They both use the same corporeality of RAM besides: 6GB.
On benchmark tests, the phones merchandise blows, with the A52 offering meliorate overall operation co-ordinate to Geekbench 5. Samsung's phone posted respective scores of 637 and i,866 in the general performance criterion's unmarried-core and multicore tests. The Pixel 4a 5G managed 598 and ane,614 scores on the aforementioned tests.
When information technology comes to graphics, though, the Pixel 4a 5G racked up the ameliorate score on the 3D Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited test, scoring 2,959 to the A52 5G'southward 2,875.
Arguably the A52 can make meliorate use of its performance thank you to its larger, higher refresh rate display. In terms of the numbers though, it'southward near enough a dead estrus.
Winner: Depict
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: 5G connectivity
Each telephone supports 5G. However Google has a key advantage.
In the the U.Southward., the Pixel 4a 5G comes in both sub-6GHz and mmWave versions of 5G (though the Pixel 4a 5G UW sold by Verizon does price more than the version that uses sub-6GHz 5G). The A52 5G simply has sub-6GHz 5G in both the U.S. and U.K.
This distinction won't make a divergence to U.K. customers, who don't have mmWave networks to connect to anyway, but Verizon customers will prefer the option of having a telephone that works on their network, fifty-fifty if they do have to pay a little more for information technology.
Winner: Google Pixel 4a 5G
Samsung Milky way A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Battery life and charging
The Pixel 4a 5G contains a three,885 mAh battery, which lasted 8 hours and 12 minutes on the Tom'south Guide custom battery test. That's below the boilerplate time of effectually 10 hours, which is disappointing given how well the rest of the phone performs.
We haven't run our battery test on the Galaxy A52 even so, but based on its larger 4,500 mAh battery, Samsung's phone has the potential to terminal longer than the Pixel 4a 5G. Only larger displays — particularly those with high refresh rates — tin can be a major power bleed, and so using the A52 5G with its 120Hz fashion active may cause its bombardment life to drop beneath that of the Pixel. Our testing volition tell the tale.
For charging, the A52 5G comes out slightly ahead of the Pixel 4a 5G. Samsung bundles the phone with a 25W charging brick. (That's a departure from the flagship Galaxy S21 phones, which transport without a charger.) The Pixel 4a 5G comes with an 18W brick.
That said, the Pixel charges faster, reaching 46% full after xxx minutes. That comapres to 34% for the Galaxy A52 5G, though Samsung'south telephone has a larger battery, which skews the comparison somewhat. Accounting for capacities, the A52 5G charges about 14% faster than the Pixel.
Winner: Samsung Milky way A52 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Software
Samsung and Google both use Android, though they implement the software in very different ways on the Galaxy A52 5G and Pixel 4a 5G.
Google launched the Pixel 4a 5G with Android 10, but the phone has since been upgraded to Android eleven. With Google phones getting three years of Android updates, we'd expect the Pixel 4a 5G to become both Android 12 this yr as well as an additional update in 2022.
The Android experience on the Pixel 4a 5G is also cleaner than what you lot'll experience with the Galaxy A52 5G, which layers Samsung's 1 UI three.0 interface on pinnacle of Android 11. That means a lot more custom visuals and many more than Samsung-made apps aslope the built-in Google offerings, which makes for a much busier-looking interface.
If yous're a long-time Samsung user, and then having the company'south custom apps is less likely to pose an event for you. For the average user even so, we retrieve the plainer interface of the Pixel 4a 5G is the more enjoyable to use.
Winner: Google Pixel 4a 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Verdict
The Galaxy A52'due south series of wins beyond a number of different categories propels it to a victory in our Samsung Milky way A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G face up-off. The Pixel 4a 5G performed well, only offering less potent hardware seems to accept sealed its identify as a runner-up.
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (x points) | 8 | 7 |
| Design (10 points) | 7 | half-dozen |
| Display (15 points) | 12 | ten |
| Cameras (20 points) | 16 | 17 |
| Operation (15 points) | ix | nine |
| 5G (5 points) | 2 | 4 |
| Battery (15 points) | 11 | ix |
| Software (10 points) | viii | 10 |
| Overall (100 points) | 73 | 72 |
While the results prove an overall win for the Milky way A52, the Pixel 4a 5G may still exist the right choice for some users. Its more than meaty size and wider 5G compatibility in the U.S. are both potential good reasons to pick it instead of the A52. Information technology likewise remains one of the best photographic camera phones, though the gap with the Galaxy A52 5G'due south photo-taking abilities is non every bit wide every bit you might think.
The Samsung telephone is definitely the phone to become in the U.K. where it'due south significantly cheaper. Awaiting the results of our bombardment test, the Milky way A52 5G also looks like a better bet for a long-lasting device. And it's hard to overlook a fast-refreshing display in a phone that costs less than $500.
Source: https://www.tomsguide.com/face-off/samsung-galaxy-a52-5g-vs-google-pixel-4a-5g-whats-the-best-5g-phone-under-dollar500
Posted by: bauerbessuchim40.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: What’s the best 5G phone under $500?"
Post a Comment